AI engineer, Researcher & Founder.

My accepted paper at ICML 2026 is Likelihood over Estimation: Robust Quadratic Discriminant Analysis for Heavy-Tailed Distributions with Theory and Evidence. I'm building LawMate, an AI legal workspace for Kerala High Court advocates. PhD, Indian Institute of Science.

Niranjana Ambadi

At ICML 2026 — Seoul

Likelihood over Estimation: Robust Quadratic Discriminant Analysis for Heavy-Tailed Distributions

Machine learning classifiers like Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (QDA) assume your data looks like a bell curve (Gaussian). But real-world data — fraud transactions, pulsar signals, network intrusions — has heavy tails: extreme outliers are far more common than a bell curve predicts. When you apply classical QDA to this kind of data, it fails to classify outliers correctly.

The core insight

There are two ways existing QDA can go wrong with heavy-tailed data:

  • Wrong model — the Gaussian likelihood underweights outliers, so the classifier is systematically wrong even with perfect knowledge of the parameters.
  • Wrong estimation — the standard covariance matrix estimator becomes unreliable (effectively blows up) when data has infinite variance.

The key finding is counterintuitive: fixing the likelihood model (problem #1) matters more than fixing the estimator (problem #2). Stable-QDA replaces the Gaussian likelihood with a multivariate elliptical α-stable distribution, which naturally handles heavy tails — and this drives most of the improvement.

What is an α-stable distribution?

Think of it as a generalization of the bell curve. Just as the Central Limit Theorem says averages of many random variables converge to a Gaussian, the Generalized CLT says that sums of heavy-tailed variables converge to an α-stable distribution. So α-stable is the "right" model for heavy-tailed phenomena by the same foundational logic that makes Gaussian the right model for ordinary data.

What did the paper prove?

Stable-QDA is Bayes consistent — given enough data, it converges to the theoretically best possible classifier. It works very well even if you don't know the exact tail heaviness (α = 1.5 works universally as a default). Classical QDA under heavy tails converges to the wrong answer permanently, no matter how much data you have.

Code & reproducibility

The full implementation of Stable-QDA and all experimental code are released on GitHub — the classifier itself plus scripts to reproduce every result in the paper, so researchers can build on this work or apply Stable-QDA directly to their own heavy-tailed classification problems.

AuthorsNiranjana Ambadi · Eugene Pinsky
VenueSeoul, South Korea
Poster sessionTue, Jul 7, 2026 • 10:30 AM – 12:15 PM KST. HALL A #4210

Core Focus: Building Trustworthy AI Applications at Scale

What I'm working on

Research

Robust learning under heavy tails

My research work (ICML 2026) asks what happens to classical ML classifier QDA when the Gaussian assumption breaks — heavy tails, contamination, heteroscedasticity — and how correcting the likelihood makes classification effective again.

  • Stable-QDA — likelihood correction beats estimator robustification (ICML 2026)
  • Information-theoretic views of in-context learning & LLM inference
Publications →

Founder · LawMate

An AI workspace for Kerala High Court advocates

LawMate brings court-safe AI to legal practice: drafting, judgment analysis, bilingual Malayalam–English translation, precedent research and more — with an architecture where citation hallucination is structurally impossible.

  • Drafting tool with 29+ KHC document types, grounded generation with enforced citations
  • BNS/BNSS/BSA ↔ IPC/CrPC/IEA statute crosswalk — deterministic tools
  • Built on AWS Bedrock and AWS Agentcore with multi-tenant isolation by design
lawmatekerala.com →

Background

Where I've been

2026 — PRESENT

Founder & CEO, LawMate Private Limited

Building an AI-powered legal workspace for Kerala High Court advocates — from architecture to go-to-market.

2022 — 2024

Associate, Goldman Sachs

Onboarding workflow for Private Wealth Management and Compliance automation at scale in a regulated environment.

2020

PhD, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru

Network information theory — matroid theory, network coding. Seven publications including ISIT, ICC, WCNC.

EARLIER

MS, Boston University · Applications Engineering, Oracle

Plus: MIT Schwarzman College of Computing Data Science & ML Certificate; DeepLearning.AI PyTorch Certificate.

ICML 2026 — accepted paper (Regular)
ICML Silver Reviewer Award
Reviewer, ICML 2026 & NeurIPS 2026

Contact

Let's talk

  • Meeting at ICML in Seoul?
  • Exploring collaboration on robust ML, inference optimization, or linear algebra?
  • Curious about AI for courts, looking for internships or wanting to contribute?

Kindly reach me at +1 (617) 487-9895 / lawmatekerala@gmail.com